Jump to content
Forum²

Recommended Posts

Posted
That's why I had to have the 3rd interface added. When I would install hyper-v, it makes you select a network interface for the vm's. I select the 3rd interace, which should route traffic from the vlan over the router to the lan port, then RRAS translates traffic coming in on the lan port over to the wan port.
Posted
Wait, if you have the 3rd Nic with the same IP class of your LAN 10.0.0.0 you must do the same work you do for the other interface, so routing will be made correctly.

--------------------------------------------------------

Tu peux aussi crire en franais.

Du kannst auch auf Deutsch schreiben.

Puoi scrivere anche in italiano.

--------------------------------------------------------

Posted
Hyper v has an address of 10.0.0.0 and the other interface (LAN) is on the same network (10.0.0.0)

--------------------------------------------------------

Tu peux aussi crire en franais.

Du kannst auch auf Deutsch schreiben.

Puoi scrivere anche in italiano.

--------------------------------------------------------

Posted
Yes, but traffic trying to work on the clients of the LAN should be routed through to the WAN. If a computer gets it's IP from LAN, it goes computer >> lan >> wan for internet route. Why doesn't this work with the 3rd nic? Perhaps if i add the vlan adapter to the NAT portion of the RRAS role and set it to private network, it will route it's internet through the WAN port. OR!!! What if I disinclude the 3rd nic, install hyper-v first to create the vlan adapter, then go into ipv4 of that and set the ip manually to 10.0.0.1, then configure DHCP to work off the vlan adapter instead of the LAN adapter, the configure RRAS on the VLAN >> WAN route. It's so crazy it just might work...
Posted
It can't work, if you put the same ip of your router (10.0.0.1) your network simply doesn't work. The problem is that you CANNOT surf (actually exit) from your LAN (10.0.0.0) also with others computers. It looks like there are 2 same IPs. Maybe you have mis configured a static or DHCP IP somewhere. Is it possible?

--------------------------------------------------------

Tu peux aussi crire en franais.

Du kannst auch auf Deutsch schreiben.

Puoi scrivere anche in italiano.

--------------------------------------------------------

Posted
C:\Documents and Settings\Owner>tracert 8.8.8.8

 

Tracing route to google-public-dns-a.google.com [8.8.8.8]

over a maximum of 30 hops:

 

1 30 ms

Posted

that was just with DHCP and RAS. Then I installed hyper-v and got this:

 

C:\Documents and Settings\Owner>tracert 8.8.8.8

Tracing route to google-public-dns-a.google.com [8.8.8.8]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 * * * Request timed out.
2 * * * Request timed out.
3 * 4 ms 4 ms L100.PHLAPA-VFTTP-97.verizon-gni.net [173.49.21.
1]
4 5 ms 6 ms 7 ms G0-6-3-2.PHLAPA-LCR-22.verizon-gni.net [130.81.1
39.140]
5 9 ms 9 ms 7 ms so-3-1-0-0.PHIL-BB-RTR2.verizon-gni.net [130.81.
22.60]
6 8 ms 12 ms 17 ms 0.so-7-0-0.XL4.PHL6.ALTER.NET [152.63.3.81]
7 13 ms 32 ms 19 ms 0.so-1-0-1.XL4.NYC4.ALTER.NET [152.63.1.170]
8 26 ms 29 ms 15 ms TenGigE0-5-1-0.GW8.NYC4.ALTER.NET [152.63.21.73]

9 39 ms 40 ms 33 ms Internet-gw.customer.alter.net [152.179.72.66]
10 15 ms 14 ms 29 ms 216.239.43.114
11 57 ms 24 ms 49 ms 72.14.239.93
12 29 ms 29 ms 16 ms 72.14.236.200
13 17 ms 37 ms 22 ms 216.239.49.145
14 17 ms 17 ms 22 ms google-public-dns-a.google.com [8.8.8.8]

Trace complete.

Posted

And again. strange results.

 

C:\Documents and Settings\Owner>tracert 8.8.8.8

 

Tracing route to google-public-dns-a.google.com [8.8.8.8]

over a maximum of 30 hops:

 

1 7 ms

Posted

And from the VM pre-restart:

 

C:\Users\Administrator>tracert 8.8.8.8

 

Tracing route to google-public-dns-a.google.com [8.8.8.8]

over a maximum of 30 hops:

 

1

Posted
Post restart. Every computer, including the host, vm, and other physical server, tracert always goes to 10.0.0.1 for 30 hops then gives up.
Posted
I deleted the virtual network adapter from the config, restarted, and it worked. Reinstalled, restarted, and it stopped. This is beyond my realm of smartness.
Posted

Your problem seems to be the firewall.

 

Also when the traceroute works, the second "hop" fails, and there should be your firewall (after the first gateway).

 

It's ok that a HOP is dropped, but actually the same device (assuming it is your firewall), is blocking some traffic. Maybe there's PORT SECURITY configured on a switch / port and when the mac-address changes, it blocks the port.

--------------------------------------------------------

Tu peux aussi crire en franais.

Du kannst auch auf Deutsch schreiben.

Puoi scrivere anche in italiano.

--------------------------------------------------------

Posted
I found the issue. I had to uncheck the "Allow management operating system to share this network adapter" Everything works fine now. Thanks for all of your help.
Posted
This resolved your issue but for me this is not the actual problem. I'm still thinking that your problem was a switch or firewall blocking the mac address, because that option is always on and you have the issue ONLY after a restart... but I could be wrong...

--------------------------------------------------------

Tu peux aussi crire en franais.

Du kannst auch auf Deutsch schreiben.

Puoi scrivere anche in italiano.

--------------------------------------------------------

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...